- Capture detailed photos and Full HD movies with the powerful 24.2 megapixel CMOS sensor
- Features Nikon's new EXPEED 4 image processor and a light sensitivity range of up to ISO 12,800 to capture the finest detail even in dark situations
- Weighing just 410 grams (Body only) and boasting a much smaller, retractable 18-55mm VR kit lens, the lightweight D3300 makes it more comfortable than ever to carry a Digital SLR
- Easy to use D-Movie function can capture Full HD movie footage at frame rates up to 50/60p
- Guide mode gives step-by-step instructions and sample images to help you capture exactly the kind of photos and movies you want
All Questions
Answer:
All Nikon DSLR cameras are excellent for bird photography, the 18-55 kit lens is good but you will definitely need a bigger lens to capture birds that arent within reach, The Sigma 70-300mm lens is good and is low budget as well. Just my thoughts othere will have some different views I am sure :-) Good luck.
By Amazon Customer on 14 June 2015
By Amazon Customer on 14 June 2015
If you are serious about photography, the lenses it comes with (there are two packages sold, I think, with different lenses) are not very good and will spoil your photography. Get the body and buy lenses separately. If you want to take snaps, family groups and so on, and sometimes photograph birds, then it will be OK to use the standard lenses, and a zoom is OK for that - the longer-range. But a zoom is ALWAYS worse than single-distance lenses because of the extra glass and the design compromises.
If you want to take very good long-distance shots, with no chromatic or physical distortions, then you will spend a lot on the lens - several hundred. The shorter the zoom range, all else being equal, the better the images will be (so a 35-100 zoom will be worse than a 60-90). Once an image is screwed up by a bad lens, you will not be able to correct it, regardless of the software you use.
After that, the camera. The image sensor introduces artifacts, and the image processing introduces more. These are correected for in the camera, but again, garbage in, garbage out. The larger the sensor the better, and it is not just about pixel-count. So get a good photography mag and read the reviews, decide slowly. There is little price difference between the D3300 and the D5500, and I would get the D5500 - better camera. But the Nikon is not necessarily the best for you. Look at the reviews and consider a Pentax. The lenses are interchangeble and Pentax is a standard mount, the thing will use lenses going back decades (so you can get second-hand lenses that are massively better than the modern ones and cheaper). Think lenses first, camera second.
Finally, I can't recommend a zoom lens or a zoom lens range, because I don't photograph birds and I suspect that your needs are different, but the principles above certainly apply. Because these digital cameras use a small chip, only the centre of the lens is in use - the cost in lenses comes from making it uniform over the whole diamter, with minimal distortion of the edge compared to the middle. This means the lenses can be cheaper and thinner (hence lighter). It also means that you can use an older lens that was not quite so wonderful, because the middle bit is all that is in use. That deends on how much you care about automatiuc functions such as shake control and autofocus - but autofocus is not quite as good as manual focus, and shake only matters at long exposures and long focal lengths - so a small tripod and daylight photography cures that, giving a cleaner picture. I only ever use manual settings, ESPECIALLY with these cheap digitals, and it does not take long to learn about exposure values and so on. Don't save as jpeg - they are already distorted bu the process. Save as RAW and process on your computer using better software. The files are bigger, but the pictures are better.
On the other hand, if what you want is to go on holiday and have a lightweight camera on hand, then some of the single-lens zooms are just as good as this thing, provided you don't push them too far. If you are going to print photos, then the printer will print at perhaps 600 dpi, so that limits the resolution anyway. Again, narrowest zoom range that meets your needs (I am guessing that up to 200mm will be enough, and down to, say, 70mm - in 50mm SLR equivalent measurements, because DSLRs are actually different! - and go for image quality, not bells and whistles. Which? is no good for reviews, but What Camera? and some others are.
Good luck and enjoy! Pentax, I think. :)
Good luck! see less
By N. Tuson on 14 June 2015
If you want to take very good long-distance shots, with no chromatic or physical distortions, then you will spend a lot on the lens - several hundred. The shorter the zoom range, all else being equal, the better the images will be (so a 35-100 zoom will be worse than a 60-90). Once an image is screwed up by a bad lens, you will not be able to correct it, regardless of the software you use.
After that, the camera. The image sensor introduces artifacts, and the image processing introduces more. These are correected for in the camera, but again, garbage in, garbage out. The larger the sensor the better, and it is not just about pixel-count. So get a good photography mag and read the reviews, decide slowly. There is little price difference between the D3300 and the D5500, and I would get the D5500 - better camera. But the Nikon is not necessarily the best for you. Look at the reviews and consider a Pentax. The lenses are interchangeble and Pentax is a standard mount, the thing will use lenses going back decades (so you can get second-hand lenses that are massively better than the modern ones and cheaper). Think lenses first, camera second.
Finally, I can't recommend a zoom lens or a zoom lens range, because I don't photograph birds and I suspect that your needs are different, but the principles above certainly apply. Because these digital cameras use a small chip, only the centre of the lens is in use - the cost in lenses comes from making it uniform over the whole diamter, with minimal distortion of the edge compared to the middle. This means the lenses can be cheaper and thinner (hence lighter). It also means that you can use an older lens that was not quite so wonderful, because the middle bit is all that is in use. That deends on how much you care about automatiuc functions such as shake control and autofocus - but autofocus is not quite as good as manual focus, and shake only matters at long exposures and long focal lengths - so a small tripod and daylight photography cures that, giving a cleaner picture. I only ever use manual settings, ESPECIALLY with these cheap digitals, and it does not take long to learn about exposure values and so on. Don't save as jpeg - they are already distorted bu the process. Save as RAW and process on your computer using better software. The files are bigger, but the pictures are better.
On the other hand, if what you want is to go on holiday and have a lightweight camera on hand, then some of the single-lens zooms are just as good as this thing, provided you don't push them too far. If you are going to print photos, then the printer will print at perhaps 600 dpi, so that limits the resolution anyway. Again, narrowest zoom range that meets your needs (I am guessing that up to 200mm will be enough, and down to, say, 70mm - in 50mm SLR equivalent measurements, because DSLRs are actually different! - and go for image quality, not bells and whistles. Which? is no good for reviews, but What Camera? and some others are.
Good luck and enjoy! Pentax, I think. :)
Good luck! see less
By N. Tuson on 14 June 2015
Superb for birds - and [almost] anything else. Re a zoom lens, as always I'd do exactly what the ever-sensible Ken Rockwell tells us @ http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/recommended-cameras.htm#serious - inc. re the other Nikon [& other] telephoto lenses.
Meanwhile, I like my D3300 more & more & more: I never use my D90 any more. see less
By c en france on 14 June 2015
Meanwhile, I like my D3300 more & more & more: I never use my D90 any more. see less
By c en france on 14 June 2015
In a word yes.
The image quality is very detailed thanks to the 24Mb processor. The processor is also fast (i.e. if you see something you can turn the camera on and grab a picture without having to wait).
The camera has a sports mode which, if combined with its facility to take a series of pictures at the same time, should be great for taking action shots of birds in flight.
Finally, the camera has a facility to turn off the noise of the shutter firing so you don't disturb the birds.
Re. the lens, yes you will need a more powerful zoom than the standard 18 - 55mm kit lens. Ask your camera shop for advice or do your own research. There's plenty of choice, both Nikon branded and 3rd party.
P.S. I should also have said that the D3300 is rather smaller and easier to carry around than many other DSLRs, which is handy if you are out of doors and on the move. see less
By Marmoset on 27 June 2015
The image quality is very detailed thanks to the 24Mb processor. The processor is also fast (i.e. if you see something you can turn the camera on and grab a picture without having to wait).
The camera has a sports mode which, if combined with its facility to take a series of pictures at the same time, should be great for taking action shots of birds in flight.
Finally, the camera has a facility to turn off the noise of the shutter firing so you don't disturb the birds.
Re. the lens, yes you will need a more powerful zoom than the standard 18 - 55mm kit lens. Ask your camera shop for advice or do your own research. There's plenty of choice, both Nikon branded and 3rd party.
P.S. I should also have said that the D3300 is rather smaller and easier to carry around than many other DSLRs, which is handy if you are out of doors and on the move. see less
By Marmoset on 27 June 2015
Hi Tom. This is an excellent camera for taking pictures of birds and other wildlife. The standard stock lens, 18-55mm, is adequate with a modest zoom, but yes you would need a decent zoom lens. The Nikon Lens that would be a replacement for the stock lens is Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR Lens, and if you bought this one you would probably be able to leave it on the camera except for close up work. The zoom lens I purchased from Amazon is the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR Lens, which is excellent and a very good price. It follows on nicely from the 18-55mm stock lens, which has to be swapped out. It all depends on your experience, convenience and budget. Just remember, to get the best from your camera make sure it is a DX or DX compatible lens, as it doesn't have to be a Nikon. However the Nikon lenses do have the VR (Vibration Reduction) facility which some other makes do not have and with a zoom lens can be very handy if you don't have a tripod. Hope this helps.
Question:
Answer:
12 months from the seller and 24 months from nikon.
yes and phone nikon for free extra year warranty (INFO ON BOX)
Should do and I bought the square trade warranty as well as its really good
Should do and I bought the square trade warranty as well as its really good
Answer:
You can get lens hoods that fit the filter ring on the front of the lens. Some of my older lenses have plastic lens hoods as supplied that fit an outer ring, but they tend to come off a bit too easily.
Hi John, sorry mate this is one thing I've never tried/ What I can tell you is that the one supplied with the 55-200mm Lens does not fit. There are definitely grooves there to accept one. I've had a quick look on the Nikon site:- http://www.europe-nikon.com/en_GB/products/category_pages/accessories/category_accessories_lens.page? and there a few sown there, and I'm sure Amazon will be willing to supply. I like a bit of Lens Flare myself, as long as I am expecting it!
Answer:
D3300 has a hot shoe on it and can take an external flash unit.
75 of 77 people found the following review helpful
on 19 July 2015
I really wanted to use this camera for a long time before I gave it any sort of review. I purchased this when it first came out in 2014 and I've been using it for over a year now. It is my only camera and I'm now stretching it to its limits I find.
Build quality is excellent, after a year of usage, it looks like new. The screen is very good for the price and all the controls are very intuitive.
I'm not going to go too much into the specs as you can read into that in much more detail online. What I will say is that the sensor is great. It provides clear sharp photos, excellent dynamic range and accurate colour reproduction (don't forget I'm still using the kit lens).
I find this camera very handy for travelling as it is small and concealed. This is good for two reasons:
1. Less weight around your neck.
2. Less likely to get stolen, especially if using the very compact kit lens.
I use a GorrilaPod along with my main Velbon tripod and it has no problem on both due to the fact that it is so light and the lens does not protrude much.
This was first DSLR I purchased and my photography has improved significantly over the past year. I think now, it is even better value for money due to the fact that it's a year old. I would not hesitate to recommend this for people looking for a first DSLR
Build quality is excellent, after a year of usage, it looks like new. The screen is very good for the price and all the controls are very intuitive.
I'm not going to go too much into the specs as you can read into that in much more detail online. What I will say is that the sensor is great. It provides clear sharp photos, excellent dynamic range and accurate colour reproduction (don't forget I'm still using the kit lens).
I find this camera very handy for travelling as it is small and concealed. This is good for two reasons:
1. Less weight around your neck.
2. Less likely to get stolen, especially if using the very compact kit lens.
I use a GorrilaPod along with my main Velbon tripod and it has no problem on both due to the fact that it is so light and the lens does not protrude much.
This was first DSLR I purchased and my photography has improved significantly over the past year. I think now, it is even better value for money due to the fact that it's a year old. I would not hesitate to recommend this for people looking for a first DSLR
cc
135 of 148 people found the following review helpful
TOP 500 REVIEWERon 14 February 2014
I own a Nikon D5100 and my first impression of the D3300 was how compact and light the 3300 is in comparison! Nikon have really tried to reduce the bulk of this DSLR to make it more like a portable snapper that the beginner would likely be more used to. It is for a beginner, as is the entry level spec camera in their DSLR range. However, it is likely that I will never afford myself the luxury of spending the money that an enthusiast level camera provides so for me.. you've got to be here because of budget as all DSLRS are complicated compared to point and shoot compacts.
These are the things that i consider when looking for a good DSLR to start with.. I don't have a huge amount to spend, never have... so I have bought entry level and been there before; these are the things (just a couple of things) I found most important if your budget is tight and you need 'bang for buck!' I say:
1. Let the main thing be the main thing- Picture quality. Why buy a DSLR if you are not looking for improved image quality? The image quality for the 3300 is quite simply outstanding for the price- buy with confidence. Snapsort- which has been my 'go to' comparison site rates the image quality very highly; it has great colour range and a high resolution of pixels> 82/100
"With its huge 24 megapixel sensor, the entry-level D3300 continues to be one of the highest-resolution APS-C DX format Nikon DSLRs , and it still offers more pixels than any competing manufacturer too. The removal of the Optical Low Pass Filter has resulted in very slightly improved rendition of fine details without introducing unwanted moire effects, while the extended ISO range makes the camera a little more adaptable in low-light." -photographyblog.com
To be honest the improvement of the ISO range is, still, at such a compromise to the quality of the image that you would only use the upper reaches of low light sensitivity if you were desperate. The increased sensitivity seems irrelevant... to me anyway- I'm paying for a camera to take superb images and I don't want to compromise that.
With 24 mega pixels, you can print big images from this camera with very good detail as the image quality (if you can hold the camera steady and expose your image correctly e.t.c..) which is outstanding. To be honest if this camera is just to produce holiday snaps at a normal 6x4 then 12 mp is plenty but who doesn't want more?
2. Buy old glass.. the kit lens is only acceptable if you aren't looking for 'art' in your pics as opposed to a means of recording information. The kit lens on this camera is now more compact which will suit some but if you have an artistic ambition with this camera just buy the body and look for cheaper older glass that is far, far superior. The 3300 doesn't have a motor in the camera so older lens will not autofocus... this hasn't bothered me personally as the bokeh/blur and areas of focus in your images is something that I like more control of than automation provides.
If you are interested in sports/action photography- the improvement from 4 frames to 5 frames per second is a significant improvement and may well be worth spending the extra money on as opposed to buying the d3200 instead. 5ps or 5 frames per second is outstanding for an entry level DSLR> SO, if looking for a budget sports/action camera then this is a great choice HOWEVER>>>
If you are on a tight budget- go for the 3200 body only with old glass for arty work- if not so tight, I'd go D3300 with old glass.. if you are looking for a sports/action camera then the 5fps will be worth the extra money (go for better but older lens/glass if you can get it)
Enjoy! PS. I have always been reassured by the Nikon 2 year warranties. Certainly I haven't had any problems yet.
These are the things that i consider when looking for a good DSLR to start with.. I don't have a huge amount to spend, never have... so I have bought entry level and been there before; these are the things (just a couple of things) I found most important if your budget is tight and you need 'bang for buck!' I say:
1. Let the main thing be the main thing- Picture quality. Why buy a DSLR if you are not looking for improved image quality? The image quality for the 3300 is quite simply outstanding for the price- buy with confidence. Snapsort- which has been my 'go to' comparison site rates the image quality very highly; it has great colour range and a high resolution of pixels> 82/100
"With its huge 24 megapixel sensor, the entry-level D3300 continues to be one of the highest-resolution APS-C DX format Nikon DSLRs , and it still offers more pixels than any competing manufacturer too. The removal of the Optical Low Pass Filter has resulted in very slightly improved rendition of fine details without introducing unwanted moire effects, while the extended ISO range makes the camera a little more adaptable in low-light." -photographyblog.com
To be honest the improvement of the ISO range is, still, at such a compromise to the quality of the image that you would only use the upper reaches of low light sensitivity if you were desperate. The increased sensitivity seems irrelevant... to me anyway- I'm paying for a camera to take superb images and I don't want to compromise that.
With 24 mega pixels, you can print big images from this camera with very good detail as the image quality (if you can hold the camera steady and expose your image correctly e.t.c..) which is outstanding. To be honest if this camera is just to produce holiday snaps at a normal 6x4 then 12 mp is plenty but who doesn't want more?
2. Buy old glass.. the kit lens is only acceptable if you aren't looking for 'art' in your pics as opposed to a means of recording information. The kit lens on this camera is now more compact which will suit some but if you have an artistic ambition with this camera just buy the body and look for cheaper older glass that is far, far superior. The 3300 doesn't have a motor in the camera so older lens will not autofocus... this hasn't bothered me personally as the bokeh/blur and areas of focus in your images is something that I like more control of than automation provides.
If you are interested in sports/action photography- the improvement from 4 frames to 5 frames per second is a significant improvement and may well be worth spending the extra money on as opposed to buying the d3200 instead. 5ps or 5 frames per second is outstanding for an entry level DSLR> SO, if looking for a budget sports/action camera then this is a great choice HOWEVER>>>
If you are on a tight budget- go for the 3200 body only with old glass for arty work- if not so tight, I'd go D3300 with old glass.. if you are looking for a sports/action camera then the 5fps will be worth the extra money (go for better but older lens/glass if you can get it)
Enjoy! PS. I have always been reassured by the Nikon 2 year warranties. Certainly I haven't had any problems yet.
114 of 126 people found the following review helpful
on 8 March 2014
Having originally gone for a Canon 1000D four years ago, I grew increasingly frustrated with the very poor image quality, so I've sold all my Canon kit and have switched to Nikon's D3300. I am a beginner photographer/astro-photographer.
This is an entry level or upper entry level camera which outcompetes Canon's alternatives in the form of the 1200D and 100D. Although slightly bigger than the 100D which was marketed as the world's smallest DSLR, you wouldn't really think so if the cameras were put side by side. In terms of image quality, you get 24mp versus 18mp resolution in those two other models, but on top of this the sensor gives you 35% more image quality, 11% more colour depth, over DOUBLE the low light ISO sensitivity (half your exposure time), and 14% more dynamic range (an image shows a greater range of light levels rather than everything either dark or light). Check Dxomark scores, which are lab tests done on cameras in a controlled environment using high tech software and sensors if you want to verify these numbers.
The body feels solid yet light, grips in the hand very nicely and has intuitively placed buttons. The buttons have a nice clicky feel to them, and I particularly like the column of buttons on the left side of the screen. It has some nice features, the most notable of which is that you can apply many fun filters to your images on the camera. One of these is a 'miniature effect', where the top and bottom bands of the image are blurred as per your input to give a cool artistic effect, and in movie mode at 1080P HD resolution it compresses time by 15x so that a 45 minute movie turns into a 3m movie - making everything appear miniaturised and fast. On the auto modes any beginners will be able to use this camera, and the auto focus is top notch. If you know what you are doing with a camera, it has all the features that you would expect, including mirror lockup (it says for cleaning) if you want to be taking astrophotos. Video quality and sound is excellent. Make sure you have a high speed memory card otherwise it won't be able to record more than a small snippet of HD video. Either get a SHXC or SDHC (UHS-I) card of class 10 speed.
The kit lens provided is a new lens released with this camera. When not in use, it compacts down to just a few inches, which is really handy when walking around or storing the camera. You just pop it out via a release button and then start focusing. The quality really is superb, and this lens if not supplied with the camera costs £170. If you are looking for your first camera, I highly recommend this.
This is an entry level or upper entry level camera which outcompetes Canon's alternatives in the form of the 1200D and 100D. Although slightly bigger than the 100D which was marketed as the world's smallest DSLR, you wouldn't really think so if the cameras were put side by side. In terms of image quality, you get 24mp versus 18mp resolution in those two other models, but on top of this the sensor gives you 35% more image quality, 11% more colour depth, over DOUBLE the low light ISO sensitivity (half your exposure time), and 14% more dynamic range (an image shows a greater range of light levels rather than everything either dark or light). Check Dxomark scores, which are lab tests done on cameras in a controlled environment using high tech software and sensors if you want to verify these numbers.
The body feels solid yet light, grips in the hand very nicely and has intuitively placed buttons. The buttons have a nice clicky feel to them, and I particularly like the column of buttons on the left side of the screen. It has some nice features, the most notable of which is that you can apply many fun filters to your images on the camera. One of these is a 'miniature effect', where the top and bottom bands of the image are blurred as per your input to give a cool artistic effect, and in movie mode at 1080P HD resolution it compresses time by 15x so that a 45 minute movie turns into a 3m movie - making everything appear miniaturised and fast. On the auto modes any beginners will be able to use this camera, and the auto focus is top notch. If you know what you are doing with a camera, it has all the features that you would expect, including mirror lockup (it says for cleaning) if you want to be taking astrophotos. Video quality and sound is excellent. Make sure you have a high speed memory card otherwise it won't be able to record more than a small snippet of HD video. Either get a SHXC or SDHC (UHS-I) card of class 10 speed.
The kit lens provided is a new lens released with this camera. When not in use, it compacts down to just a few inches, which is really handy when walking around or storing the camera. You just pop it out via a release button and then start focusing. The quality really is superb, and this lens if not supplied with the camera costs £170. If you are looking for your first camera, I highly recommend this.
28 of 31 people found the following review helpful
on 4 September 2014
I'm new to DSLR's and have wanted to give one a try for many years. I read through most of the reviews on the net and decided upon this based on it being a very impressive entry level camera. I have no desires to want to produce shots worthy or publishing, but just as a hobby. So I'm in no position to go in to the technicalities as yet, but this to be a great camera. Only disappointment was that Nikon don't include a memory card with the camera - at such a small cost to them, this would have allowed me to be up and running sooner than having to order one separately. Apart from that, a great camera that I'm looking forward to using and understanding !!
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful
VINE VOICEon 26 July 2015
I wanted to step up from my compact digital camera to something better for taking more studio quality photos and as I researched what to buy, I came across the D3300. I have a Nikon compact that I was very happy with so decided that maybe sticking with Nikon was a good option.
The D3300 has a range of impressive features, most notably the 5fps shooting speed, the 24mp and the array of auto settings to make life easy for the amateur like me. The camera body is a nice light weight for its size and still feels good quality build-wise. When adding the 18-55mm kit lens, it still doesn't feel too heavy and is nicely balanced. The buttons are logically placed and easy to hand - something that cannot be said of all cameras and they too feel like they will stand the test of time, giving good feedback when pressed.
A novelty for me, after so many years of compact camera usage, was the eyepiece. This is great to have again and you can nicely frame your photos without having to waste battery life on using the screen for this purpose. Autofocus is also a little faster when not using the screen so another bonus for the return of the viewfinder! Image stabilisation on the lens is great and very handy. It is a shame that Nikon didn't build wireless functionality in but I bought a little IR remote that does the job for a fraction of the cost of the Wi-Fi adapter and it should be less conspicuous when taking photos with me in them than holding my mobile would be. Shooting video is very easy and high quality, being recorded in full 1080p HD glory.
I am still learning what I can do with the D3300 and haven't used all of the settings - including the very interesting novelty special effects. What I do know, though, is that this is a wonderful camera for those wanting to up their game but on a budget. I am pondering whether to invest in a longer range lens but am ruling it out due to pricing. At the moment the 18-55mm lens bundled with the camera body is doing everything I bought the camera to do - family photos of a much better quality than my compact point and shoot.
This is a super camera and I am very pleased I took the leap of faith and bought it. It is giving me great joy and will continue to do so as I explore better just what it can do.
The D3300 has a range of impressive features, most notably the 5fps shooting speed, the 24mp and the array of auto settings to make life easy for the amateur like me. The camera body is a nice light weight for its size and still feels good quality build-wise. When adding the 18-55mm kit lens, it still doesn't feel too heavy and is nicely balanced. The buttons are logically placed and easy to hand - something that cannot be said of all cameras and they too feel like they will stand the test of time, giving good feedback when pressed.
A novelty for me, after so many years of compact camera usage, was the eyepiece. This is great to have again and you can nicely frame your photos without having to waste battery life on using the screen for this purpose. Autofocus is also a little faster when not using the screen so another bonus for the return of the viewfinder! Image stabilisation on the lens is great and very handy. It is a shame that Nikon didn't build wireless functionality in but I bought a little IR remote that does the job for a fraction of the cost of the Wi-Fi adapter and it should be less conspicuous when taking photos with me in them than holding my mobile would be. Shooting video is very easy and high quality, being recorded in full 1080p HD glory.
I am still learning what I can do with the D3300 and haven't used all of the settings - including the very interesting novelty special effects. What I do know, though, is that this is a wonderful camera for those wanting to up their game but on a budget. I am pondering whether to invest in a longer range lens but am ruling it out due to pricing. At the moment the 18-55mm lens bundled with the camera body is doing everything I bought the camera to do - family photos of a much better quality than my compact point and shoot.
This is a super camera and I am very pleased I took the leap of faith and bought it. It is giving me great joy and will continue to do so as I explore better just what it can do.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 6 January 2015
Amazing entry level camera.
Let me point out this is my first DSLR camera so i am only comparing the images to a decent compact camera and iPhones.
Not got to grips fully with the different modes, but the sports mode has a very quick shutter speed and can take images very quickly (with a decent memory card). Also copes well with indoor pictures without graining, assuming you have a steady hand and the rooms arent too dark - Would struggle at a party or festival i think.
This has been very easy to pick up and use. My skills are getting better all the time and i find im critiquing my own work when the image is framed correctly or somthing in the background isnt right - somthing i would never have normally done with a compact. People are already very impressed with the images.
The only downside is that it is a tad on the expensive side. But if you are keen to up you images from a bridge or compact, I couldnt recomend this highly enough for your first DSLR.
Let me point out this is my first DSLR camera so i am only comparing the images to a decent compact camera and iPhones.
Not got to grips fully with the different modes, but the sports mode has a very quick shutter speed and can take images very quickly (with a decent memory card). Also copes well with indoor pictures without graining, assuming you have a steady hand and the rooms arent too dark - Would struggle at a party or festival i think.
This has been very easy to pick up and use. My skills are getting better all the time and i find im critiquing my own work when the image is framed correctly or somthing in the background isnt right - somthing i would never have normally done with a compact. People are already very impressed with the images.
The only downside is that it is a tad on the expensive side. But if you are keen to up you images from a bridge or compact, I couldnt recomend this highly enough for your first DSLR.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
on 3 September 2014
I'm new to photography but this camera is making it a pleasure, the photos I'm getting from it are amazing with brilliant detail, I'm over the moon with its performance.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 15 November 2014
Good value SLR we had the D3200 once and it was okay and decided to try out this one D 3300 and for the money it is superb real Nikon quality. Its light because its mainly plastic which is not a bad thing. The lens is great for holiday and family type shooting a real all in one lens. So if your not a pro why spend more like silly money when this will suffice to get you great shots. We don't really like compacts and this SLR gives you more control. I've had the lot from 35mm lens to one to see the moon with and all the camera bodies so know a bit about good kit and this is not at all a budget camera it is a serious piece of kit.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 21 July 2014
Brilliant bit of kit, the last SLR I owned used 35mm film so this was my first SLR since the digital revolution, I wanted to get it right and this fitted the bill just right.
I had done a bit of homework and this model had some decent reviews and in the short time I have been using it I can see why.
Thoroughly recommend it.
There was a bit of a misunderstanding about the Nikon cashback but Amazon sorted it, thanks again guys.
I had done a bit of homework and this model had some decent reviews and in the short time I have been using it I can see why.
Thoroughly recommend it.
There was a bit of a misunderstanding about the Nikon cashback but Amazon sorted it, thanks again guys.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
on 14 September 2015
Really impressed with this.
Was tempted with the 5300 and now I have the 3300 I can honestly say I don't think I would have benefitted from wifi or a pivot screen.
If you are tempted, BUY IT!
Was tempted with the 5300 and now I have the 3300 I can honestly say I don't think I would have benefitted from wifi or a pivot screen.
If you are tempted, BUY IT!
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 4 November 2015
Nikon D3300 DSLR camera with 18-55mm VRII AF-S lens.
This is sold as a good camera for beginners but with 24mp cmos chip, it is also good for any serious photographer in my opinion. I've been 'into' cameras since 35mm types became available in about the late forties-fifties and I wish these had been available then. This camera has many features and can be used in totally automatic mode or completely manual mode - and everything in between. I also have Canon a DSLR but this one is lighter. It is, I believe, the latest offering from Nikon. Excellent camera. Very well featured.
This is sold as a good camera for beginners but with 24mp cmos chip, it is also good for any serious photographer in my opinion. I've been 'into' cameras since 35mm types became available in about the late forties-fifties and I wish these had been available then. This camera has many features and can be used in totally automatic mode or completely manual mode - and everything in between. I also have Canon a DSLR but this one is lighter. It is, I believe, the latest offering from Nikon. Excellent camera. Very well featured.
on 15 December 2015
Having already got a D7100 plus 5 Nikon lens', Speedlight etc etc I bought this for 4 reasons:
1) I wanted a second body for work use
2) it is remarkable value for money, £300 inc kit lens from JL
3) it is significantly smaller and lighter for holiday/days-away type usage
4) my wife thinks the D7100 is too big and intimidating so keeps using a horrid old compact camera resulting in poor photos.
Can't begin to say how impressed I am with the D3300's performance and how it manages to have the real buttons I need there for 90+% of the time.
I tend to use it in Aperture priority mode, partly because I'm nearly always taking static subjects, and with the kit lens, to keep it a stop or 2 away from full open. The Fn button gives direct access to the ISO setting. The normal +/- exposure compensation button is on the top. 90+% of shots sorted!
So far I've mainly used it with its kit lens, both in parallel with the D7100 (+ Nikon 10-24, a superb architecture lens) for general purpose hand-held shots, and on a long weekend hol.
Having been so impressed this far, I intend to put my 50mm F1.8 on both cameras and take some shots in various demanding conditions and see what the difference is. (Will post if looks of interest)
Clearly the D7100 (or now a D7200) is a far better camera, and anyone contemplating buying higher performance lens's would be silly to save "a hap'uth of tar" on a cheap body. I suspect people taking sport type shots would see a bigger difference than I have due to the significant auto focus and metering differences. The biggest thing I miss (so far?) is exposure bracketing.
1) I wanted a second body for work use
2) it is remarkable value for money, £300 inc kit lens from JL
3) it is significantly smaller and lighter for holiday/days-away type usage
4) my wife thinks the D7100 is too big and intimidating so keeps using a horrid old compact camera resulting in poor photos.
Can't begin to say how impressed I am with the D3300's performance and how it manages to have the real buttons I need there for 90+% of the time.
I tend to use it in Aperture priority mode, partly because I'm nearly always taking static subjects, and with the kit lens, to keep it a stop or 2 away from full open. The Fn button gives direct access to the ISO setting. The normal +/- exposure compensation button is on the top. 90+% of shots sorted!
So far I've mainly used it with its kit lens, both in parallel with the D7100 (+ Nikon 10-24, a superb architecture lens) for general purpose hand-held shots, and on a long weekend hol.
Having been so impressed this far, I intend to put my 50mm F1.8 on both cameras and take some shots in various demanding conditions and see what the difference is. (Will post if looks of interest)
Clearly the D7100 (or now a D7200) is a far better camera, and anyone contemplating buying higher performance lens's would be silly to save "a hap'uth of tar" on a cheap body. I suspect people taking sport type shots would see a bigger difference than I have due to the significant auto focus and metering differences. The biggest thing I miss (so far?) is exposure bracketing.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 25 November 2015
Amazing camera! Still learning how to use it but genuinely impressed so far. My only complaint is that the camera does not even come with a memory card which I find pathetic. Other than that great buy.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 6 July 2015
Absolutely loving the camera, I've had it for a couple of weeks and have been toying around with it. - There is some fantastic standard features. - The lens that comes with the camera is a great lens for beginners and will be good for most situations although extra lenses can be bought separately. - All in all, REALLY enjoying this Camera, VERY happy that I bought it and VERY happy at the price and quality of camera.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 26 September 2015
Great camera for the price - a year or two ago features and picture quality like this would
have cost many times more. Ensure you get the latest VR II lens, as some companies
are selling the older G ED II lens as a kit with this camera body, and it doesn't have the
Vibration Reduction (VR) stabilisation feature. The one I got from Amazon had the VR lens.
have cost many times more. Ensure you get the latest VR II lens, as some companies
are selling the older G ED II lens as a kit with this camera body, and it doesn't have the
Vibration Reduction (VR) stabilisation feature. The one I got from Amazon had the VR lens.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 12 January 2015
Very pleased with the camera. For the price it is very competitive with the higher models. Fantastic pictures and the lens is a great addition. The red colour looks great and is nice to have something a little different than the average black. The included Nikon software is a bonus also. Looking forward to taking some great pictures with this one.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 18 October 2015
I really love my new camera - the colour red is also beautiful and would definitely recommend it . I have found the camera relatively easy to use for someone my age (47) although my son did help a bit. You can basically just put it in automatic mode and start using straight away.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 21 February 2015
Really good camera. Fast Delivery. Quiet professional camera... for this amount of money you couldn't ask for more.
Really happy with that order.
Thanks !
Really happy with that order.
Thanks !
11 of 14 people found the following review helpful
on 31 August 2014
I bought this to replace my old D5100. I did wonder whether I was doing the right thing as I kept reading reference to it being a camera for beginners (which I'm not) but as far as I could see it had all the features that I wanted as well as being considerably less expensive than the D5300. I'm very pleased with the camera and glad that I bought it rather than waste money on something dearer. Anyone wanting further recommendations for this DSLR could do worse than type Ken Rockwell D3300 into Google.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 5 November 2015
Great Camera for beginters. Easy to learn, produces good results and has excellent support out there in terms of the number of books and peripherals available.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 10 December 2015
Great item and I'm a happy bunny with my new toy. Takes fantastic photos. ..great for a beginner like me. Thank you..The item was packaged well.
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful
on 13 July 2014
Stunning quality, I thought my d80 was good till I had this
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 14 July 2015
This camera is probably the best beginners camera there is, if you're wanting to get into photography this is perfect.
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
on 18 May 2015
An excellent camera. Easy to use, very good image quality. Highly recommend purchasing the sigma 18-250m lens as it makes it the most compact camera ever.
on 2 August 2015
My first ever DSLR camera and I'm impressed. It is very easy to use and captures clear images, the auto-focus is fast and has great battery life. The 18-55mm VR II Lens Kit that it came with is an excellent all-rounder for closeup portrait or landscape photography. The camera is small and light (for a DSLR) that I bring it with me on all my travels.
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
on 22 August 2014
Quality product.Having previously used a Panasonic LUMIX G-2 CSC camera which was good,i thought maybe it was getting a bit old now so i sold it to help buy this camera.Best move i ever made.Straight away the quality was obvious and i am so pleased with the results.Cant recommend enough.The results seem to come from a camera that costs a lot more than this.No regrets.
on 10 December 2015
This is my first DSLR and I'm so happy. working perfectly, easy to operate. I bought with Yongnuo speedlight and remote triger, so the full set working great together. So pleased that I have chosen this camera.
Here is one of my first shots when was testing camera and the lens.
I'll recommend this camera to everyone.
Here is one of my first shots when was testing camera and the lens.
I'll recommend this camera to everyone.
17 of 23 people found the following review helpful
on 27 April 2014
Way back in the day, like 40 years ago, I was a keen photographer. With my Kodak Retina with a Zeiss lens and compure shutter I managed to learn a great deal about exposure, apertures, ev numbers, light meters and I even dabbled in developing and printing my own pictures. Back then it was a dream to be able to afford to own a decent SLR camera. For the next decades I carried on with ain't and shoot.
Jump forward 40 years and at last I can afford a DSLR, but which one? Things have move on so much that your brain spins when you do the research. Then along comes Nikon with an offer I couldn't refuse. Just because I purchased a nice S9100 a couple of years ago they offered me £100 cash back if I bought a new D3300. When I looked at the reviews and features of the camera, features I could not have dreamed of 40 years ago, it was a no-brainer.
And whilst I agree with another reviewer that it makes sense to wait a while for the price to come down, I have to say I have no regrets in buying it now. It is a superb camera, easy to handle, easy to operate, takes fabulous pictures and even has a 'newbie' guide as well. result! I haven't forgotten all I learnt back then regarding framing, lighting etc., but for the most part that's all you need as the camera can handle the rest. But when it comes to that special shot it has the features to give superb results too as you can set it to manual completely and have total control. If this sort of camera had been around when I were younger maybe I might have had a different career.
This is a stonking camera for the money, despite some saying it is overpriced. If you are looking for an entry level DSLR that will allow you to develop your skills towards the professional level, look no further. Highly recommended.
Jump forward 40 years and at last I can afford a DSLR, but which one? Things have move on so much that your brain spins when you do the research. Then along comes Nikon with an offer I couldn't refuse. Just because I purchased a nice S9100 a couple of years ago they offered me £100 cash back if I bought a new D3300. When I looked at the reviews and features of the camera, features I could not have dreamed of 40 years ago, it was a no-brainer.
And whilst I agree with another reviewer that it makes sense to wait a while for the price to come down, I have to say I have no regrets in buying it now. It is a superb camera, easy to handle, easy to operate, takes fabulous pictures and even has a 'newbie' guide as well. result! I haven't forgotten all I learnt back then regarding framing, lighting etc., but for the most part that's all you need as the camera can handle the rest. But when it comes to that special shot it has the features to give superb results too as you can set it to manual completely and have total control. If this sort of camera had been around when I were younger maybe I might have had a different career.
This is a stonking camera for the money, despite some saying it is overpriced. If you are looking for an entry level DSLR that will allow you to develop your skills towards the professional level, look no further. Highly recommended.
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
on 29 April 2015
I have a real problem with this camera. I can't stop my wife from pinching the damn thing, and my favourite lenses! It's just so easy to use while giving me all the control I need, and significantly lighter than my old D90. Most importantly, the picture quality is every bit as good as far more expensive DSLRs. It doesn't have all the bells and whistles of the D90 or newer semi-pro DSLRs easily to hand, but the vital controls are all easy to get at and the remainder are in easily driven menus. Mind you, I was tempted by the slightly more expensive new D5500, so if you want a swivelling touch screen display & a few more features I'd go for that. The added complexity might have stopped my wife pinching it...
About the only real let down was that Nikon no longer provide a hot shoe cover - saving them a few pence on the price but costing me rather more to get one.
About the only real let down was that Nikon no longer provide a hot shoe cover - saving them a few pence on the price but costing me rather more to get one.
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
on 25 May 2015
I have always bought Canon EOS before, so i was a bit wary, but this camera is great, lighter than the Canon, and the photos are superd
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on 9 January 2015
Brilliant, high quality, lightweight camera.
4 of 6 people found the following review helpful
on 15 March 2015
Bought at a shop not on Amazon. I am an amateur.
Here are my reasons for buying this camera:
1. Hand size. I am big. Sony A 6000 and Olympus PEN are, I am sure, excellent cameras, but too fiddly for my hands.
2. Good quality pics in low light.
3. Lenses that are not too expensive.
4. Camera with flash.
5. Good battery life.
Compared with old Nikon SLRs non digital, it still takes more time to take a good picture. Overall with Olympus and Sony I had a problem with the size of the cameras: too small and gadgety (I am 6'5" with ape-like hands. I am sure a child or smaller hands will find the Sony A 6000 ideal.) Prices for lenses could for many be a dealbreaker: at the end of the day cameras are going to be usable for 3-5 years before something breaks. Perhaps this is where m43 and Sony E mount falls down: I can buy several lenses and a DSLR for the price of a Sony E mount lens!
Nikon D3300 and Canon 100D are very similar. Nikon and Canon will win the fight against other makes unless Sony and Olympus realise the point and shoot market is dead and no-one in Europe or USA is willing to part with a lot fo cash for a lens when the perception of size is related to price: bigger lens bigger price, smaller lens, small price.
For most situations with normal light conditions, any camera 12+ megapixel camera will take reasonable pics but it was the low light and the fact I am fed up with points and shoots that break after 2 years.
UPDATE
Having used it for several weeks, very happy. Bought Tamrom Nikon 18-200mm lens which works well in outdoor light conditions and reasonable pictures indoors with reasonable light. Nikon 1.8G 50mm lens as well. Superb. Ideal for portraits and low light. Great quality.
If I had the cash I would buy more expensive lenses because the better suited the lens to the job in question, better the resulting picture.
Long term I think m43 and 'mid-range' compacts and bridge zooms will disappear.
The DSLRs have unintended design consequences:
1. Battery life on the D3300 is good for 300-500+ pics. The SLR viewfinder means lens need for battery over mirrorless.
2. Camera size and ergonomics. For many adults the Olympus PEN cameras are too fiddly. Bigger size in general gets more light to the sensor.
3. Lens prices. In general all falling and crushing the m43 mirrorless market. Of course you still pay a lot for stabilised lens or F2 lens that is constant throughout the zoom range, but prices are going down.
Finally the megapixel game. Make sure you print your photos: screens with better and better resolutions mean old photos will look pixellated in the future. The basic lens tech is not going to change for DSLRs; the fact you will only have to replace the camera unit in the future is another plus. m43 and Sony E mount are just way too expensive for people to buy in Europe or the US.
Well, that is my opinion. The truth is Iphones and Nokias take equally excellent pictures in full sunlight but more specialised jobs like portraits and indoor photography is where the DSLR wins hands down.
Here are my reasons for buying this camera:
1. Hand size. I am big. Sony A 6000 and Olympus PEN are, I am sure, excellent cameras, but too fiddly for my hands.
2. Good quality pics in low light.
3. Lenses that are not too expensive.
4. Camera with flash.
5. Good battery life.
Compared with old Nikon SLRs non digital, it still takes more time to take a good picture. Overall with Olympus and Sony I had a problem with the size of the cameras: too small and gadgety (I am 6'5" with ape-like hands. I am sure a child or smaller hands will find the Sony A 6000 ideal.) Prices for lenses could for many be a dealbreaker: at the end of the day cameras are going to be usable for 3-5 years before something breaks. Perhaps this is where m43 and Sony E mount falls down: I can buy several lenses and a DSLR for the price of a Sony E mount lens!
Nikon D3300 and Canon 100D are very similar. Nikon and Canon will win the fight against other makes unless Sony and Olympus realise the point and shoot market is dead and no-one in Europe or USA is willing to part with a lot fo cash for a lens when the perception of size is related to price: bigger lens bigger price, smaller lens, small price.
For most situations with normal light conditions, any camera 12+ megapixel camera will take reasonable pics but it was the low light and the fact I am fed up with points and shoots that break after 2 years.
UPDATE
Having used it for several weeks, very happy. Bought Tamrom Nikon 18-200mm lens which works well in outdoor light conditions and reasonable pictures indoors with reasonable light. Nikon 1.8G 50mm lens as well. Superb. Ideal for portraits and low light. Great quality.
If I had the cash I would buy more expensive lenses because the better suited the lens to the job in question, better the resulting picture.
Long term I think m43 and 'mid-range' compacts and bridge zooms will disappear.
The DSLRs have unintended design consequences:
1. Battery life on the D3300 is good for 300-500+ pics. The SLR viewfinder means lens need for battery over mirrorless.
2. Camera size and ergonomics. For many adults the Olympus PEN cameras are too fiddly. Bigger size in general gets more light to the sensor.
3. Lens prices. In general all falling and crushing the m43 mirrorless market. Of course you still pay a lot for stabilised lens or F2 lens that is constant throughout the zoom range, but prices are going down.
Finally the megapixel game. Make sure you print your photos: screens with better and better resolutions mean old photos will look pixellated in the future. The basic lens tech is not going to change for DSLRs; the fact you will only have to replace the camera unit in the future is another plus. m43 and Sony E mount are just way too expensive for people to buy in Europe or the US.
Well, that is my opinion. The truth is Iphones and Nokias take equally excellent pictures in full sunlight but more specialised jobs like portraits and indoor photography is where the DSLR wins hands down.
on 6 December 2015
excellent camera at a great price...luckily, I watched the d3300 raw video, before I started using it...first dslr, great for out & about...rtfm first though, great for night shots
on 11 December 2015
This camera is the real deal...excellent and the price is unbeatable...professional dslr in small size...The image quality is amazing!Nothing comes closer.buy and start shooting
12 of 17 people found the following review helpful
on 28 April 2014
I have been an amateur photographer for about 20 years and have bought many DSLR's in my time, but I have to say that the metering and resolution on this Nikon D3300 compact DSLR is absolutely fantastic.
The D3300 is so much more compact camera with the 18-55 lens attached which really makes it a easy to carry around, there is also HD video which is a first for me and that is fantastic as well.
Without rabbeting on to much it is a little belter and I am absolutely delighted with it, the Nikon supplied battery is fantastic and I have only charged it once after about 600 captures (which includes a live view as well).
If your going to buy it make sure you order some 3" screen protectors as well.
Hope this helps a bit.
Peter
The D3300 is so much more compact camera with the 18-55 lens attached which really makes it a easy to carry around, there is also HD video which is a first for me and that is fantastic as well.
Without rabbeting on to much it is a little belter and I am absolutely delighted with it, the Nikon supplied battery is fantastic and I have only charged it once after about 600 captures (which includes a live view as well).
If your going to buy it make sure you order some 3" screen protectors as well.
Hope this helps a bit.
Peter
on 24 October 2015
Really love my new toy. Is fabulous. Though I need some lessons in how to use it properly. It works well on Auto, but so many other things to do with it.
on 1 September 2014
Quality and ease of use from a sophisticated camera. I'm making pictures to be proud of! Get the 80-300 Nikon zoom to go with it - that's a perfect kit.
on 15 December 2014
Very happy with this item! I have been looking at it since it came out but could never afford it. The discount and christmas money made it possible!
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
on 18 November 2015
I had a D3100 a few years ago & regretted selling it. This D3300 shares all of its strengths & has far superior image quality.
Very light & compact but well made. I love the in-camera RAW processing. Paired with my AF-S 50mm f1.8 the image quality is nothing short of stunning, even at ISO 1600.
Amazing value.
Very light & compact but well made. I love the in-camera RAW processing. Paired with my AF-S 50mm f1.8 the image quality is nothing short of stunning, even at ISO 1600.
Amazing value.
6 of 9 people found the following review helpful
on 18 April 2014
This camera can really blow the competition out of the water. The 24.2MP really does help this camera stand out from the crowd. The quality of image that you can take with this camera is remarkable. When I took my first few pictures with this camera I was astonished.
Another great feature of this camera is the 18-55mm VR II Lens Kit. Most people discount kit lenses however this is really good quality. The lens doesn't let down the side at all and I have found that this lens is better than some of the lenses that I have paid for separately.
The retractable feature of this lens is also very useful if you don't have much space available to you and all it take is the press of a button to get it back to full size and full working order.
The only let down of this camera is it's performance at high ISO's. This does hinder the camera in low light situations by giving the picture a lot of noise, however I don't use the camera in low light situations very often so it isn't really a problem for me however if you were to mainly be using it in low light situations then it may not be the best camera for you.
All in all this is a great camera for the price. These days you can easy spend over £1000 on a decent camera however now there is no need with the D3300 on the market. Nikon have done a really great job with this camera
Another great feature of this camera is the 18-55mm VR II Lens Kit. Most people discount kit lenses however this is really good quality. The lens doesn't let down the side at all and I have found that this lens is better than some of the lenses that I have paid for separately.
The retractable feature of this lens is also very useful if you don't have much space available to you and all it take is the press of a button to get it back to full size and full working order.
The only let down of this camera is it's performance at high ISO's. This does hinder the camera in low light situations by giving the picture a lot of noise, however I don't use the camera in low light situations very often so it isn't really a problem for me however if you were to mainly be using it in low light situations then it may not be the best camera for you.
All in all this is a great camera for the price. These days you can easy spend over £1000 on a decent camera however now there is no need with the D3300 on the market. Nikon have done a really great job with this camera
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
on 6 November 2014
I've got a D90 but the D3300 is streaks ahead in almost every way and makes the D90 seem hopelessly clumsy and old-fashioned. The only thing for me the D3300 lacks is a screen grid but I just LOVE it. As usual, well done Ken Rockwell for telling me what to do - right as always. THANK YOU Ken!
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
on 28 February 2015
Arrived by date given, the only problem is the plug adapter for the charger does not work but I had another so fully charged and in use. Camera great and even I can understand the cameras functions using the inbuilt prompting. This replaces my Nikon D200.
on 24 October 2014
Works great. so many settings still working through them but does what it says on the tin Great delivery well packaged thank you
on 18 November 2014
Ah yes, my baby... Amazing photographic quality AND stunning 1080p 60FPS video quality. Use it for video logging on YouTube.
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 10 November 2014
A brilliant piece of kit. Has 1080 hd video and an external mic output which is great for vidro makers. Nice and small for a dslr but packs a punch. The removal of the anti alias filter makes it worth the extra in price to the d3200. The kit lens does the job fot amateur photography enthusiasts although any wildlife or long range shots need a telephoto lens. Would recommend a polarising filter as a cheap way of making photos even better. (52mm kit lens by the way) battery life is good. Although a second battery is easily the best addition to this camera. Just wish the screen had a proximity sensor so it would turn off when you use the viewfinder instead of manually turning it off.
Overall a nice change to canons of similar spec I have used. And the colour makes it seem better and different from the others out there. Would reccomend to first time dslr owners and video makers. Easily worth spending a bit more for this over a top of the range bridge camera. And the clunk of the shutter feels more dedicated than a mirrorless camera.
Overall a nice change to canons of similar spec I have used. And the colour makes it seem better and different from the others out there. Would reccomend to first time dslr owners and video makers. Easily worth spending a bit more for this over a top of the range bridge camera. And the clunk of the shutter feels more dedicated than a mirrorless camera.
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
on 27 March 2015
Camera v/g unfortunately came with instructions in French ,contacted shipping co and situation was resolved,instructions in English obtained
on 14 December 2015
Researched several starter DSLR cameras and glad I chose this one. Absolutely love it!
on 14 January 2015
fantastic camera.. great shots, clear icons on screen and a really good help mode
on 20 August 2014
Beautiful, easy to use, great result when you get the finished picture A+
on 9 January 2015
Bought for my wife, she loves it. So I bought one also. A great camera.
3 of 5 people found the following review helpful
on 31 May 2014
I spent a long time deliberating over whether to get back into the SLR market, but this Nikon caught my eye. A few days of use has convinced me that I made the right decision - it's as simple to use as you want it to be, with the flexibility to use more manual functionality should you choose to. Picture quality is superb, and I haven't taking a duff shot yet! It has size very much in it's favour, giving you full SLR benefits in a package similar to many of the current crop of bridge cameras. I know I'm going to get a lot of use out of this camera.
on 25 November 2014
im a nikon fans i use this as my back up camera better than my d3100
on 5 October 2015
I think this model is quite user-friendly for the DSLR beginner.
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
It arrived very quickly and in plenty of time even though I left ordering it quite late so very pleased. My wife thinks it's a g
on 13 July 2014
I bought this camera as a birthday present for wife. It arrived very quickly and in plenty of time even though I left ordering it quite late so very pleased. My wife thinks it's a great camera but still has a lot to learn about it. The photos she has taken with it are of super quality. I've had a little go with it as well. I would recommend this camera and the supplier, great service.
on 13 December 2014
Lovely product really please with our purchase many thanks
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 3 November 2014
I can't add more positive comments than any other reviewer out there. It's a must buy for entry level photographer and a dslr that will last for years before you want to move on. Only drawback is the absence of automatic HDR photos (although you can do bracketing etc, and you have the "HDR painting" effect.
Very very good choice all in all.
Very very good choice all in all.
on 9 December 2014
I love this, the picture quality is fantastic.
on 16 November 2014
Just waiting for fog free day to try it out!
on 8 November 2014
Great little camera easy to use good results
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 11 July 2014
Fantastic easy camera to use I have had some great shots with this already and combined with 'Nikon D3300: From Snapshots to Great Shots' you can get the most from your camera, supposed to be entry level but I am very impressed
6 of 11 people found the following review helpful
on 12 April 2014
This is my first venture into digital SLR and while there are obviously more advanced cameras (indeed, I originally considered Nikon's D800) the D3300 is both smaller and lighter. Perhaps, or so I am informed, not as solidly built as Nikon's flagship cameras, it certainly seems robust enough and is very comfortable to use with its bundled lens (18-55) as well as the 55-200 that I purchased separately. From the little time I have owned it (nearly two months) it certainly seems to do everything I need; indeed, there is still much for me to get to grips with. I have been extremely happy with the results (including the prints from a HP 3520 printer). Very pleased indeed.
276 of 288 people found the following review helpful
#1 REVIEWER#1 HALL OF FAMEon 10 June 2014
The D3300 is a minor update to the D3200, it does offer most of what a new user might be looking for, or a decent choice for someone moving up from a bridge or compact camera, wanting to expand their photography knowledge
It's also easy to use and learn on.
There are a few limitations though compared to higher priced bodies, which I will go into later on. This won't matter to many users, but they are worth a mention
A quick summary of the notable strong and weaker points of the camera
Pros:
+ Excellent image quality from the 24mp sensor, good dynamic range too. Nikon removed the optical low pass filter this increases the resolution a bit, you can shoot RAW and JPEG
+ 11-point AF system with central cross sensor is quite good enough at this price point
+ Nicely made and a smaller more compact size for a DSLR, quite comfy in the hand
+ Fairly well featured for an entry DSLR, has most of what you might want to start off with (bear in mind cons section)
+ Has HD video 1920 x 1080 50p which is sharp and clean. You do have autofocus (contrast) with the AF-F mode
+ 3.5mm mic input
+ "Guide mode" can be useful for some people it can help with shooting situations, but it's not perfect
+ Range of creative effect/filters to play with
+ Metering and WB are improved over the previous model quite consistent in most situations
+ Built in white light AF assist (helps the camera focus in lower light) it works, though it can be distracting for people shots inside
+ Good battery life around 600 shots
+ 5fps continuous shooting is quite fast for an entry level camera, buffer is quite small though (about 6 frames raw)
Cons:
- No exposure bracketing (about time at least something was added here), no depth of field preview
- No Auto FP (High speed sync), this allows your external flash to sync at all shutter speeds with the camera, particularly useful for daylight fill in flash photography, where you will easily go over the normal 1/200 flash sync speed with faster lenses or on a bright day. Camera doesn't support it so you will have to use ND filters as a workaround (to reduce light to the camera)
- No built in AF motor in the body. This is less of an issue now that most recent Nikon lenses have motors built into them, but if you are digging around for second hand (or non AF-S)lenses it's something to consider. You can still use screw driven lenses but manual focus only
- Live view is fairly slow to focus, it's ok for non moving subjects though. Video AF-F can jump about a bit trying to focus
- No support for wireless (CLS) flash with the built in flash. You can use radio triggers though or optical slave flashes (Yongnuo etc)
Body controls wise, fairly straight forward. Menus are easy to use and navigate. There is a lack of some controls on the body, direct buttons for some important functions are not present such as ISO and WB settings. You can set the "Fn" button on the left hand side under the flash raise button can be set to (WB, ISO, image size and active D lighting) this helps quite a lot. As does using the "info" button which allows you to change settings on the rear LCD by moving around with the D pad.
Nikon probably could do with re-vamping the controls a bit on their entry models, ie more direct controls. But it's ok for this segment.
There is no vertical grip option from Nikon for the D3300. You can use the IR remote ML-L3 with the camera
Canon v Nikon:
I won't get into this major debate, both makers have large and extensive systems, in terms of lenses and bodies.
As a general guide Canon tend to be a bit more generous on entry bodies in terms of functionality (Auto FP, Wireless flash, DOF preview, bracketing) Nikon offer higher resolution sensors with better dynamic range, all their bodies have a built in AF assist light (none of Canon's do) If you are taking a photo course Canon might be a slightly better choice (those missing things might be useful for learning)
Try both (and other makers too) and see what you like best. You can't beat a real hands on with cameras some bodies might just feel right, some might not. There are no real right or wrong choices, everyone is different. But it's worth thinking about what friends/family are using you can borrow and use lenses and other items. Look at the practical elements of your choice too.
The removal of the optical low pass filter and slight increase in frames per second are the main improvements over the D3200, it is not a huge update over that model so if you have a D3200 you might want to look at the D5300 or even D7000/7100 to step up a bit to the next level.
Second body shooters:
The D3300 makes for a relatively inexpensive back up body, but the limitations on flash (esp Auto FP), less controls and no built in AF motor could be a factor. Look at what your needs are. This will do the job, but you might want to pick up something else if you need that.
Image quality is very good, but 24mp is stretching things a bit on some cheaper lenses, it's worth looking at lens choices to get the most out of the camera. 24mp is overkill for most users, including many serious photographers..though landscape shooters won't complain. Don't just buy the camera just for 24mp, it won't make you a better photographer, it can yield excellent prints if you have good optics and with good processing of images Low light is quite good but resolution drops off as it does on all 24mp APS-C cameras, you can reduce the jpeg image size if you wish.
So overall a pretty good entry level camera, it would be nice to see Nikon improve things a bit more esp in relation to the flash limitations and lack of bracketing (the last one has been a bit of a sore point for ages now) For the outlay it's capable of excellent results. It's also quite a bit cheaper than the D3200 was at launch.
Is there more to buy? Well that's down to you, one reason for DSLR's being a popular choice is you have the flexibility to get lenses you need or might want (macro, telephoto, ultra wide angle) You can spend a fortune on equipment, or just buy a few lenses that interest you. Building up a system takes time and can be very expensive. So take it easy for a while and learn the basics first.
It's also easy to use and learn on.
There are a few limitations though compared to higher priced bodies, which I will go into later on. This won't matter to many users, but they are worth a mention
A quick summary of the notable strong and weaker points of the camera
Pros:
+ Excellent image quality from the 24mp sensor, good dynamic range too. Nikon removed the optical low pass filter this increases the resolution a bit, you can shoot RAW and JPEG
+ 11-point AF system with central cross sensor is quite good enough at this price point
+ Nicely made and a smaller more compact size for a DSLR, quite comfy in the hand
+ Fairly well featured for an entry DSLR, has most of what you might want to start off with (bear in mind cons section)
+ Has HD video 1920 x 1080 50p which is sharp and clean. You do have autofocus (contrast) with the AF-F mode
+ 3.5mm mic input
+ "Guide mode" can be useful for some people it can help with shooting situations, but it's not perfect
+ Range of creative effect/filters to play with
+ Metering and WB are improved over the previous model quite consistent in most situations
+ Built in white light AF assist (helps the camera focus in lower light) it works, though it can be distracting for people shots inside
+ Good battery life around 600 shots
+ 5fps continuous shooting is quite fast for an entry level camera, buffer is quite small though (about 6 frames raw)
Cons:
- No exposure bracketing (about time at least something was added here), no depth of field preview
- No Auto FP (High speed sync), this allows your external flash to sync at all shutter speeds with the camera, particularly useful for daylight fill in flash photography, where you will easily go over the normal 1/200 flash sync speed with faster lenses or on a bright day. Camera doesn't support it so you will have to use ND filters as a workaround (to reduce light to the camera)
- No built in AF motor in the body. This is less of an issue now that most recent Nikon lenses have motors built into them, but if you are digging around for second hand (or non AF-S)lenses it's something to consider. You can still use screw driven lenses but manual focus only
- Live view is fairly slow to focus, it's ok for non moving subjects though. Video AF-F can jump about a bit trying to focus
- No support for wireless (CLS) flash with the built in flash. You can use radio triggers though or optical slave flashes (Yongnuo etc)
Body controls wise, fairly straight forward. Menus are easy to use and navigate. There is a lack of some controls on the body, direct buttons for some important functions are not present such as ISO and WB settings. You can set the "Fn" button on the left hand side under the flash raise button can be set to (WB, ISO, image size and active D lighting) this helps quite a lot. As does using the "info" button which allows you to change settings on the rear LCD by moving around with the D pad.
Nikon probably could do with re-vamping the controls a bit on their entry models, ie more direct controls. But it's ok for this segment.
There is no vertical grip option from Nikon for the D3300. You can use the IR remote ML-L3 with the camera
Canon v Nikon:
I won't get into this major debate, both makers have large and extensive systems, in terms of lenses and bodies.
As a general guide Canon tend to be a bit more generous on entry bodies in terms of functionality (Auto FP, Wireless flash, DOF preview, bracketing) Nikon offer higher resolution sensors with better dynamic range, all their bodies have a built in AF assist light (none of Canon's do) If you are taking a photo course Canon might be a slightly better choice (those missing things might be useful for learning)
Try both (and other makers too) and see what you like best. You can't beat a real hands on with cameras some bodies might just feel right, some might not. There are no real right or wrong choices, everyone is different. But it's worth thinking about what friends/family are using you can borrow and use lenses and other items. Look at the practical elements of your choice too.
The removal of the optical low pass filter and slight increase in frames per second are the main improvements over the D3200, it is not a huge update over that model so if you have a D3200 you might want to look at the D5300 or even D7000/7100 to step up a bit to the next level.
Second body shooters:
The D3300 makes for a relatively inexpensive back up body, but the limitations on flash (esp Auto FP), less controls and no built in AF motor could be a factor. Look at what your needs are. This will do the job, but you might want to pick up something else if you need that.
Image quality is very good, but 24mp is stretching things a bit on some cheaper lenses, it's worth looking at lens choices to get the most out of the camera. 24mp is overkill for most users, including many serious photographers..though landscape shooters won't complain. Don't just buy the camera just for 24mp, it won't make you a better photographer, it can yield excellent prints if you have good optics and with good processing of images Low light is quite good but resolution drops off as it does on all 24mp APS-C cameras, you can reduce the jpeg image size if you wish.
So overall a pretty good entry level camera, it would be nice to see Nikon improve things a bit more esp in relation to the flash limitations and lack of bracketing (the last one has been a bit of a sore point for ages now) For the outlay it's capable of excellent results. It's also quite a bit cheaper than the D3200 was at launch.
Is there more to buy? Well that's down to you, one reason for DSLR's being a popular choice is you have the flexibility to get lenses you need or might want (macro, telephoto, ultra wide angle) You can spend a fortune on equipment, or just buy a few lenses that interest you. Building up a system takes time and can be very expensive. So take it easy for a while and learn the basics first.
M J Taylor7 months ago
I wouldn't fully comprehend all this expert knowledge! Note: The 24 megapixel resolution may be better to have now because in the future TV/PC screen resolution is going to increase, so a photo taken now is going to shrink down on the future screens; quite possibly from being too big to fit on the screen down to the size of a postcard or even a postage stamp! Also, memory capacity and upload speed will be increasing as technology advances. Size is everything - the bigger the megapixel - means the better resulting archive, in the future.
I wouldn't fully comprehend all this expert knowledge! Note: The 24 megapixel resolution may be better to have now because in the future TV/PC screen resolution is going to increase, so a photo taken now is going to shrink down on the future screens; quite possibly from being too big to fit on the screen down to the size of a postcard or even a postage stamp! Also, memory capacity and upload speed will be increasing as technology advances. Size is everything - the bigger the megapixel - means the better resulting archive, in the future.
Shopping Voucher9 months ago
You buy loads of stuff Mr Baz. Can I ask where you buy it all because none of it appears as an Amazon verified purchase? Is there a secret shop where you buy your gadgets and cameras at cheaper prices than those offered by Amazon. I'm aware that you get lots of free stuff but I'm referring to the non free stuff. Thanks in advance.
You buy loads of stuff Mr Baz. Can I ask where you buy it all because none of it appears as an Amazon verified purchase? Is there a secret shop where you buy your gadgets and cameras at cheaper prices than those offered by Amazon. I'm aware that you get lots of free stuff but I'm referring to the non free stuff. Thanks in advance.
stu kz9 months ago
thanks for the review, I`m moving to this from a Canon bridge camera, which I hav`nt had for long (2 months), but its not good enough for my needs. I`m looking forward to getting a d3300, I`m not a fan of canon tried them twice, not again, I thought i`d let people know this camera is available from Expedite Electronics for £280, I ordered mine yesterday, they have good solid reviews, are based in hong kong, but the goods are posted from England.
thanks for the review, I`m moving to this from a Canon bridge camera, which I hav`nt had for long (2 months), but its not good enough for my needs. I`m looking forward to getting a d3300, I`m not a fan of canon tried them twice, not again, I thought i`d let people know this camera is available from Expedite Electronics for £280, I ordered mine yesterday, they have good solid reviews, are based in hong kong, but the goods are posted from England.
Dmon11 months ago
The thing is that he argued so viciously against the Nikon D3200 that he was bound to put a number of people off. However, anyone looking at reviews in general would see how popular that camera was and is. With only a 'minor' update (his description) he recommends the D3300 which defies logic !!!!. If I were a complete beginner and knowing how this chap operates I'd skip his reviews, quite frankly.
The thing is that he argued so viciously against the Nikon D3200 that he was bound to put a number of people off. However, anyone looking at reviews in general would see how popular that camera was and is. With only a 'minor' update (his description) he recommends the D3300 which defies logic !!!!. If I were a complete beginner and knowing how this chap operates I'd skip his reviews, quite frankly.
The Leveller11 months ago
Because he's been caught out yet AGAIN! If this review did not have so many votes on it he would delete this too Dmon to wash away your comment. This would not be the first review he's deleted to cover his tracks. Well spotted Dmon.
As far as I'm concerned any other top 10 reviewer should be number one. Stolen Valour.
22 of 26 people found the following review helpful
on 5 July 2014
Build Quality
=======================
The camera feels very solid and well built even though it's all plastic. The grip in particular is excellent. Attaching and detaching the lens is easy and gives a satisfying click which removes all doubt of whether or not the lens is secured in place.
Still Images
=======================
The camera produces outstanding images in any situation you throw at it. The detail is good from the center all the way to the edges. The quality of image is good enough to do large prints. The built in flash is very good for darker or night shots.
Lens
=======================
The kit 18-55 VR lens is very good. There's not a massive zoom (approximately 3x in consumer terms), but with the huge image size, you can easily afford to crop in post, to achieve more of a zoom. The image stabilised lens is worth having, but it won't cure the most shaky of users.
Video
=======================
The actual video quality is excellent, but this is my niggle with the camera - the auto focus is very loud and is audible in the video footage and as such, is very distracting when playing the video. The sound is like tapping a metal folk on a tin can constantly and makes the camera feel cheap.
This isn't an issue if you plan to throw music over your footage, or want to use an external micropohone, but I can't see many amatuer photographers using an external mic, unless you're a professional on a tight budget.
Note that even if you're not recording video, the auto focus is still noisey, so beware if you're going somewhere that won't tolerate noise.
I also found it was quite slow to focus as you move the camera around. For example, I panned about 180 degrees indoors and each time the camera was almost in focus, it then started to refocus because of the panning. The result was the whole 180 degrees were out of focus. For this reason, I decided to return the camera but I appreciate that some won't care so much about the video on a DSLR.
Battery Life
=======================
Nikon quote over 700 shots, and they aren't wrong. It goes on forever, even when using live view. The battery charges in around two hours, which is very respectable.
Size and Portability
=======================
The camera is smaller than most DSLRs, and when the lens is folded away it's even smaller, which brings me to my next point. The collapsible lens in theory sounds good, but in practice I would prefer to have the lens ready to go for quick snaps. You're only saving a few cm when the lens is collapsed, and in that state, you can't even browse the menus or settings. I found it undesirable to have to extend the lens and then return to the zero zoom state before I could compose the shot.
If size is an issue then currently the smallest DSLR is the Canon 100D, although it's arguably not a great deal smaller than the Nikon D3300 because Canon only reduced the body size not the lens, and when you have the standard Canon lens (which isn't compact) the reduction isn't much. The difference in weight with the kit lens between the Nikon and Canon is about 54g, which is roughly the weight of a shot glass.
Features and Usage
========================
The camera has most of the features of pro DSLRs. The huge 24MP and large sensor dwafs its Canon rivals (although MPs alone aren't a direct indication of quality). It does have the "consumer" features such as effects that you'd probably try once then never use. There is a guide mode, aimed at beginners, but I'd suggest just getting stuck in and play with the settings. Also, YouTube is your fiend, where you can find many tutorials and general how-to's.
Nice To Have's
========================
At this price point, there's a few things you'd like to have, notably an articulating or touch screen but I suppose Nikon need to differentiate the entry level D3000 series.
Summary
========================
The value for money on this camera is arguably unbeatable, you get a huge range of features at this price point, compared to its rivals. If you can live with the focus noise then I'd recommend this camera to anyone from the absolute beginner, up to advanced enthusiasts that don't want to step up to the 5000 or 7000 series.
=======================
The camera feels very solid and well built even though it's all plastic. The grip in particular is excellent. Attaching and detaching the lens is easy and gives a satisfying click which removes all doubt of whether or not the lens is secured in place.
Still Images
=======================
The camera produces outstanding images in any situation you throw at it. The detail is good from the center all the way to the edges. The quality of image is good enough to do large prints. The built in flash is very good for darker or night shots.
Lens
=======================
The kit 18-55 VR lens is very good. There's not a massive zoom (approximately 3x in consumer terms), but with the huge image size, you can easily afford to crop in post, to achieve more of a zoom. The image stabilised lens is worth having, but it won't cure the most shaky of users.
Video
=======================
The actual video quality is excellent, but this is my niggle with the camera - the auto focus is very loud and is audible in the video footage and as such, is very distracting when playing the video. The sound is like tapping a metal folk on a tin can constantly and makes the camera feel cheap.
This isn't an issue if you plan to throw music over your footage, or want to use an external micropohone, but I can't see many amatuer photographers using an external mic, unless you're a professional on a tight budget.
Note that even if you're not recording video, the auto focus is still noisey, so beware if you're going somewhere that won't tolerate noise.
I also found it was quite slow to focus as you move the camera around. For example, I panned about 180 degrees indoors and each time the camera was almost in focus, it then started to refocus because of the panning. The result was the whole 180 degrees were out of focus. For this reason, I decided to return the camera but I appreciate that some won't care so much about the video on a DSLR.
Battery Life
=======================
Nikon quote over 700 shots, and they aren't wrong. It goes on forever, even when using live view. The battery charges in around two hours, which is very respectable.
Size and Portability
=======================
The camera is smaller than most DSLRs, and when the lens is folded away it's even smaller, which brings me to my next point. The collapsible lens in theory sounds good, but in practice I would prefer to have the lens ready to go for quick snaps. You're only saving a few cm when the lens is collapsed, and in that state, you can't even browse the menus or settings. I found it undesirable to have to extend the lens and then return to the zero zoom state before I could compose the shot.
If size is an issue then currently the smallest DSLR is the Canon 100D, although it's arguably not a great deal smaller than the Nikon D3300 because Canon only reduced the body size not the lens, and when you have the standard Canon lens (which isn't compact) the reduction isn't much. The difference in weight with the kit lens between the Nikon and Canon is about 54g, which is roughly the weight of a shot glass.
Features and Usage
========================
The camera has most of the features of pro DSLRs. The huge 24MP and large sensor dwafs its Canon rivals (although MPs alone aren't a direct indication of quality). It does have the "consumer" features such as effects that you'd probably try once then never use. There is a guide mode, aimed at beginners, but I'd suggest just getting stuck in and play with the settings. Also, YouTube is your fiend, where you can find many tutorials and general how-to's.
Nice To Have's
========================
At this price point, there's a few things you'd like to have, notably an articulating or touch screen but I suppose Nikon need to differentiate the entry level D3000 series.
Summary
========================
The value for money on this camera is arguably unbeatable, you get a huge range of features at this price point, compared to its rivals. If you can live with the focus noise then I'd recommend this camera to anyone from the absolute beginner, up to advanced enthusiasts that don't want to step up to the 5000 or 7000 series.
27 of 36 people found the following review helpful
TOP 1000 REVIEWERon 10 March 2014
This is the latest incarnation of the Nikon entry level DSLR. It's great at taking pictures - shoot RAW or j-peg and the results are great. There's also a host of creative effects and situational settings. The kit lens is ok. You'd be well advised to pick up one of the prime Nikon DX lens which are cheap and of good quality. Lightweight plastic body is quite durable but offers no weather resistance. The only thing not to like is the price - you'd be mad to buy any Nikon DX camera when it comes out new. A much smarter move is to buy the model just before the latest version, that way you get a brilliant camera which is every bit as good in almost all respects as 'the latest model'. So if you have the five hundred pounds to spend on a DSLR, I'd look at something higher up on the Nikon DSLR line. Stick with Nikon - great cameras, well made, much better than Canon, which have lower build quality and are a less classy product all round. You'll get more camera and you won't fall such a victim to the markets. Think smart and you might thank me later! However, if, from your comparisons, you think there is something that the D3300 has that the D3200 hasn't got, then that might be a draw for you, and fair enough in that case. But for me, I'd go for the D3200 right now. Or even the D3100 if money is in short supply. In fact, the D3100 is the camera I recommended to my brother recently. But if you pinned me down today, I'd go for the D3200. With the money you save you could almost buy the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens.
:) Of course and please let me know if you do decide to setup a blog
Again, mainly just of family events - birthdays, celebrations, maybe some basic youtube videos etc.
I recently lost 5 years worth of photographs and had no backup! So I guess im keen to start rebuilding my library as soon as possible. That being said Ive always wanted to own a DSLR and love looking at photographs so decided I should buy a DSLR - just didnt realise how much choice was out there!
Yes, Ive also looked at the Panasonic Lumix LX7. Its a great camera - but everyone seems to advise on getting a Nikon!
thanks again
StR1 year ago
You're very welcome. And thank you for the encouragement - I have been thinking about doing something like a blog or whatnot. As regards video, I think it depends on what kind of video you want to do. As regards noise, yes the motor for the focus will make some noise and this would be picked up on the video audio. However, if you are doing just a video of, say, someone talking to camera, then manual focus would be fine as the focus is not shifting. Otherwise, focus will make some noise. It depends how far you want to take it. To be honest, I used a Panasonic Lumix LX7 for short videos and I was very impressed with the quality of that. What kind of video do you have in mind?
You're very welcome. And thank you for the encouragement - I have been thinking about doing something like a blog or whatnot. As regards video, I think it depends on what kind of video you want to do. As regards noise, yes the motor for the focus will make some noise and this would be picked up on the video audio. However, if you are doing just a video of, say, someone talking to camera, then manual focus would be fine as the focus is not shifting. Otherwise, focus will make some noise. It depends how far you want to take it. To be honest, I used a Panasonic Lumix LX7 for short videos and I was very impressed with the quality of that. What kind of video do you have in mind?
sorabh sharma1 year ago
Ive spent the last few days searching and searching for answers and you have pretty much summed up everything I wanted to know in these few paragraphs. Thank you so much for taking the time out to write such a clear and concise reply. You should seriously consider writing your own blog (which I would love to read may I add and im sure it would undoubtedly help a lot of others like myself!).
Ive spent the last few days searching and searching for answers and you have pretty much summed up everything I wanted to know in these few paragraphs. Thank you so much for taking the time out to write such a clear and concise reply. You should seriously consider writing your own blog (which I would love to read may I add and im sure it would undoubtedly help a lot of others like myself!).
I have watched Jared's review :) but your answers made more sense to me.
If I could trouble you with just one last question. On a youtube review (cant remember which one) the reviewer said the Nikon 3200 makes a lot of noise when changing focus on video mode. Do you find this to be an exaggeration ? I am not looking to make perfect videos and all my editing will be done on photoshop and final cut pro anway) but I would like to have the option of using the video mode from time to time. I really dont want to have to carry a DSLR and a separate handycam. - I was considering the Sony A58 but your review on the Nikon 3200 has seriously changed things for me..
thanks again !
StR1 year ago
Hello Sorabh. The [[ASIN:B001S2PPT0 Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens]] gives an approximate focal length of 53mm on the D3200, because of the crop factor. This means it is a good standard lens, ideal for various applications, including portraits. The [[ASIN:B006TAP096 Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 85mm f/1.8G Lens]] is an FX lens, meaning it is made specially for the FX Nikon cameras. These are the expensive, full frame sensor cameras (D610 model and upwards). On the crop sensor (DX) Nikons, this particular lens will act as a 127.5mm, which is a medium telephoto value. In terms of what is the best thing to do, I would go for a Nikon camera, whichever one you like, bearing in mind what I said in my review, and 'make do' with the kit lens that comes with it. Then, if you decide you'd like to buy a second lens, you can make your choice freely and do your research. I think the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens is excellent, and presently, if you buy it directly from Amazon.co.uk, there is a £20 cash-back. Of course I wouldn't allow cash-back offers pressure me to buy something I'm not ready for, but the option is there.
Hello Sorabh. The [[ASIN:B001S2PPT0 Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens]] gives an approximate focal length of 53mm on the D3200, because of the crop factor. This means it is a good standard lens, ideal for various applications, including portraits. The [[ASIN:B006TAP096 Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 85mm f/1.8G Lens]] is an FX lens, meaning it is made specially for the FX Nikon cameras. These are the expensive, full frame sensor cameras (D610 model and upwards). On the crop sensor (DX) Nikons, this particular lens will act as a 127.5mm, which is a medium telephoto value. In terms of what is the best thing to do, I would go for a Nikon camera, whichever one you like, bearing in mind what I said in my review, and 'make do' with the kit lens that comes with it. Then, if you decide you'd like to buy a second lens, you can make your choice freely and do your research. I think the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens is excellent, and presently, if you buy it directly from Amazon.co.uk, there is a £20 cash-back. Of course I wouldn't allow cash-back offers pressure me to buy something I'm not ready for, but the option is there.
Now to get to the main thrust of your comment, a prime lens will always deliver a better image quality than any zoom. Zoom lenses, by their very nature, are a compromise, whereas fixed focal length, 'prime' lenses are optimised for their particular focal length. The aperture on the 35mm is an impressive F1.8, which means it will let in lots of light. The 35mm DX lens is an ideal 'normal' lens. If you want specifically to make portraits, the good news is that there is an affordable [[ASIN:B00005LEN4 Nikon AF NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8D Lens]]. This would be good for portraits. Note, however, that it is an FX lens, meaning it has no internal focussing motor. The Nikon D3XXX and D5XXX series cameras lack a focusing motor in the camera and rely on a motor in the lens, which the DX lenses have built in. But this older style FX lens lacks that internal motor. On the likes of the D7000 or D7100 DX cameras, they have a motor for focusing built in to the camera body. But hard luck if you want to use that lens on the D3XXX or D5XXX series cameras - it's manual focus only. But I think that is ok. Especially for portraits, because you should have plenty of time to focus and in my view it gets back to the old ways of photography, enjoying making some settings yourself.
The video is pretty good and adequate for family purposes or perhaps for making your own Youtube videos! Have a look on Youtube and you will be able to view sample videos made with all these cameras.
A good review video you can also search for on Youtube is 'Nikon D3200 Review, Jared Polin'.
Any other questions, just ask and I will be happy to help if I can.
sorabh sharma1 year ago
Excellent review and comment. Very informative. If I may, Id like to ask why you recommended the 35mm lens specifically? I am a beginner and Id mainly like to get into shooting portraits and videos - typically of friends and family for birthday events. I have heard the best prime lens to buy are the 85mm ?
Excellent review and comment. Very informative. If I may, Id like to ask why you recommended the 35mm lens specifically? I am a beginner and Id mainly like to get into shooting portraits and videos - typically of friends and family for birthday events. I have heard the best prime lens to buy are the 85mm ?
Would you say the video quality of the 3200d is good ? I had a nikon j2 but found the autofocus was a bit poor and choppy.
Thank you :)
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
on 10 May 2015
This camera is great for me! I'm off to uni studying photography and I wanted to get myself a proper photography camera. I have already taken my camera out for 2 photo shoots since getting it last week. The only thing that is worth warning you about is that DSLR's don't come with a memory card. So buy it aswell!
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful
on 6 June 2014
This is an 'easy-to-use' camera but is capable of most advanced proceedures.
I find it is suitable for first time camera buffs but equally satisfactory for the more experienced
I would recommend it to anybody whether an ardent photographer or 'just a snapper
I find it is suitable for first time camera buffs but equally satisfactory for the more experienced
I would recommend it to anybody whether an ardent photographer or 'just a snapper
7 of 10 people found the following review helpful
on 15 July 2014
This marks my return to SLR photography after an absence of some 10 years (at one point, in the days of film, we used to take 3 Pentax SLRs, each loaded with a different type of film, on holiday with us!) but since then we have used Sony Cybershots and a camera phone (I won't say which one in case I am accused of advertising the maker's products, which is definitely NOT the case). These are my first impressions, based on having used the D3300 for 2 weeks on holiday and taking about 300 pictures to date.
I chose this camera in preference to the larger D7100, which I had originally intended to buy, because it was smaller and lighter, issues that (whether one likes it or not) are important if one is going to carry the camera around on holiday and / or visit crowded tourist attractions, as we tend to do.
The main plus points compared with (say) the Cybershot are:
* Speed, it powers up and focuses almost instantly
* Using the "Sports" mode and shooting a burst of pictures is great if, for example, you want to grab a quick shot out of a bus window. No more lamp posts, parked cars etc to spoil the picture because you can usually get at least one clear shot and delete the rest
* Picture quality is, of course, very good (but see the caveats below about performance in low light)
* The feel of the camera is very nice with a lovely solid "thunk" when the shutter release button is pressed.
The negatives are:
* The size and weight obviously
* The menu and controls have a distinctly old fashioned feel to them and take a bit of getting used to
Compared with a traditional film SLR
* "Modes" and automation have largely replaced know how so, for example, instead of having to know the correct combination of aperture setting and shutter speed for a particular type of shot you simply select the relevant "Mode" (e.g. Portrait or Landscape) and let the camera do the rest
* Which is just as well because setting the aperture and shutter speed manually are a pain. In the old days you just turned a knob on the top of the camera to set the shutter speed and twisted a ring on the lens to set the aperture. Now you have to fiddle about with menus and arrows and the whole thing takes ages. This is progress?
(To be fair, I am referring to the kit lens here. Does anyone know whether a more expensive lens would allow the user to set the aperture directly on the lens itself in manual mode?)
Finally, on the subject of low light performance, while it is still early days I have a distinct impression that:
* Using flash, especially close up, makes the subject look unnaturally bright and
* Auto focusing is less accurate
Changing to manual focus is, at least, quite easy now that I know about this issue (and don't forget to turn the auto focus back on when I have finished!) while the brightness can probably be corrected in an editing program if necessary.
I chose this camera in preference to the larger D7100, which I had originally intended to buy, because it was smaller and lighter, issues that (whether one likes it or not) are important if one is going to carry the camera around on holiday and / or visit crowded tourist attractions, as we tend to do.
The main plus points compared with (say) the Cybershot are:
* Speed, it powers up and focuses almost instantly
* Using the "Sports" mode and shooting a burst of pictures is great if, for example, you want to grab a quick shot out of a bus window. No more lamp posts, parked cars etc to spoil the picture because you can usually get at least one clear shot and delete the rest
* Picture quality is, of course, very good (but see the caveats below about performance in low light)
* The feel of the camera is very nice with a lovely solid "thunk" when the shutter release button is pressed.
The negatives are:
* The size and weight obviously
* The menu and controls have a distinctly old fashioned feel to them and take a bit of getting used to
Compared with a traditional film SLR
* "Modes" and automation have largely replaced know how so, for example, instead of having to know the correct combination of aperture setting and shutter speed for a particular type of shot you simply select the relevant "Mode" (e.g. Portrait or Landscape) and let the camera do the rest
* Which is just as well because setting the aperture and shutter speed manually are a pain. In the old days you just turned a knob on the top of the camera to set the shutter speed and twisted a ring on the lens to set the aperture. Now you have to fiddle about with menus and arrows and the whole thing takes ages. This is progress?
(To be fair, I am referring to the kit lens here. Does anyone know whether a more expensive lens would allow the user to set the aperture directly on the lens itself in manual mode?)
Finally, on the subject of low light performance, while it is still early days I have a distinct impression that:
* Using flash, especially close up, makes the subject look unnaturally bright and
* Auto focusing is less accurate
Changing to manual focus is, at least, quite easy now that I know about this issue (and don't forget to turn the auto focus back on when I have finished!) while the brightness can probably be corrected in an editing program if necessary.
on 10 May 2015
Fantastic camera; prompt service but be aware: no English instructions and a cheap travel adapter supplied for the European plug.
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on 6 November 2014
We got the camera, everything is fine, the only thing that bothers me quite a lot is that the product description doesn't mention that the camera comes only with a UK and US charging adapter.. If you buy this in Europe at least include the Europe adapter
4 of 7 people found the following review helpful
on 11 May 2014
I purchased the D3300 body as a small & lightweight substitute for my Nikon D7000. There are a few facilities which I would dearly love to be included on the d3300 the three I miss the most is - no depth of field preview, no viewfinder grid lines to help keep things level and although there is a panoramic facility you can only use it using live view and hence your looking through the rear monitor rather than the viewfinder argghhhhhh. I personally hate rear view monitors, yes you get 100% view out of them but the vast majority are almost useless in sunshine! give me a viewfinder any day ;) likewise the special effects on the camera are accessed via live view mode but you can get around this by using the retouch menu to add simple special effects in camera on photos you have previously taken. Obviously for more control you would use photoshop etc. The battery supplied is good for over 700 frames which is unusual for a camera in this class.
2 of 15 people found the following review helpful
on 29 August 2015
so far my outdoor shots are rather drab and focus is not great. I am going to look at adjusting the settings but think I should be able to just use the camera without fiddling with the settings. I compared the pictures with the same shots at the same time taken with my old Nikon and it is definitely the camera that is not great
No comments:
Post a Comment